I think
that our strategy lesson, front loading with images, went fairly well. I think
that Maegan and I worked well as a partnership. We both contributed equally to
the power point, notes sheet, and lesson plan. We both spoke equally and contributed
to the group discussion and overall presentation. Another thing that went well
was engaging the class in group discussion. We used the turn and talk strategy deliberately
so that the students could participate in a low stakes partner discussion
before we brought the whole class into the discussion. We also planned who was
going to talk about which slides, how long the students got to discuss, how
long students had to read the article, planned questions to ask about each
slide. Mostly everything that happened, we had planned for.
Although
many things went well, there is one main thing I would do differently. During
our group discussion, Caroline brought up the idea of starting with an abstract
picture and then move to more concrete pictures. I think that this was a
wonderful idea and one that I would implement if I had to teach this lesson
again. Many of the picture we showed were very similar (mountainside, ski
slope, slide, staircase), but in the future I would add maybe a picture of
slope on an actual graph. I think that showing only pictures of slope in the
real world creates a disconnect between material and application. If I only
ever show them slope in the real world, students may not realize what slope
looks like on a mathematical graph.
An
unexpected challenge I faced was presenting to people my age. Presenting to my
peers is very nerve racking for me and I was very anxious going into this
presentation. However, I think that the success of this strategy lesson helped
me come out of my comfort zone.
Overall,
it was fun, and I REALLY enjoy this particular strategy J
Kaylie
Herbert
322
No comments:
Post a Comment